State and National Fast Facts

NDTAC’s Fast Facts Web pages present National and State longitudinal data on students served under Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, for State agency programs. Fifty States, along with Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, receive funds under Subpart 1. The information provided on these pages highlights grantees’ funding, student demographics, and key academic outcomes for children and youth who are neglected or delinquent and enrolled in these programs. The four key academic outcomes featured also are used to track Title I, Part D, program performance and are of particular importance to grantees and the U.S. Department of Education. Additional data summaries related to the Title I, Part D, program can be found on the following Web pages:

 

Choose a State from the drop down box to view the data.



I. United States Funding, Programs and Students

Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 provides supplemental funds for education programs for youth who are neglected or delinquent. Subpart 1 funds are awarded directly to State education agencies, which then award subgrants to State agencies serving youth who are neglected or delinquent (e.g., juvenile detention, juvenile corrections, and adult corrections). In the 2009–10 school year (SY), the federal Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, program distributed a total of $49.16 million to such programs.

Funding Allocation, Number of Programs and Students Served

Program Information 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Subpart 1 Funding
US $ 48,552,075 $ 47,703,870 $ 49,166,325
Number of Programs
US 786 771 720
Number of Students Served
US 131,860 125,456 109,146

Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, Allocation (in millions)

Line graph depicting Federal allocations to United States from 2000 to 2009.

II. United States Program Types

States may use Subpart 1 funds to assist educational programs for youth who are neglected and programs for youth in juvenile detention, juvenile corrections, and adult corrections. Programs for youth who are neglected serve students placed in public or private residential facilities due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians. Delinquent facilities (detention or corrections) are public or private institutions serving children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision.

Student Distribution in Subpart 1 Programs by Program Type in 2009-10

Bar graph depicting the percentage of students in each program type in the United States in 2009-10.

table icon show/hide table data

Student Participation by Program Type

United States
Program Type 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Juvenile Detention 44,201 33.5% 40,126 32% 35,198 32.2%
Juvenile Corrections 47,695 36.2% 50,059 39.9% 36,916 33.8%
Adult Corrections 31,125 23.6% 25,711 20.5% 31,280 28.7%
Neglect 6,637 5% 7,100 5.7% 4,625 4.2%
Other 2,202 1.7% 2,460 2% 1,127 1%
Total 131,860 100% 125,456 100% 109,146 100%

III. United States Demographics

All State education agencies must provide data to the U.S. Department of Education on student participation in Part D programs, disaggregating by gender, race/ethnicity, and age. The racial/ethnic categories currently reported are Asian/Pacific Islander; Black, non-Hispanic; Hispanic; American Indian/Alaska Native; and White, non-Hispanic. If State grantees provided data identifying students as an “other” racial or ethnic group, those data are included here.

Nationally, in SY 2009–10, the majority of students enrolled in State agency neglected and delinquent programs and receiving Title I, Part D funds were between the ages of 14 and 18 years (72%) and 19 and 21 years (23%) and predominantly male (85%). These percentages reflect the national trends in age and gender across the previous three years.
 

United States
Student Participation by Race/Ethnicity in 2009-10

Pie graph depicting the race/ethnicity of students in the United States in 2009-10.

table icon show/hide table data

Student Participation by Race/Ethnicity

United States
Race/Ethnicity 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
American Indian/Alaska Native 3,379 2.6% 3,052 2.4% 2,404 2.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 1,740 1.3% 1,560 1.2% 1,517 1.4%
Black, non-Hispanic 57,766 43.8% 55,863 44.5% 50,101 46%
Hispanic 22,469 17% 21,677 17.3% 18,690 17.2%
White, non-Hispanic 45,997 34.9% 42,495 33.9% 35,822 32.9%
Other 531 0.4% 808 0.6% 405 0.4%
Total 131,882 100% 125,455 100% 108,939 100%

N<# indicates that the demographic data in this cell have been suppressed due to small N sizes. The number at which data are suppressed varies by State and is based on the suppression values State have agreed upon with the Department of Education. In instances in which only one category meets the suppression number, and additional category is suppressed as well using the same notation, though the value may exceed the indicated number.



IV. United States Academic Outcomes

All State education agencies must report on a series of academic and vocational outcomes attained by students enrolled in programs receiving Title I, Part D funds. The figures below feature two of the key performance measures—earning high school course credits and attaining a GED or high school diploma. These figures reflect the percentage of age-eligible students attaining these outcomes while enrolled in, or shortly after leaving, a Title I, Part D–funded educational program.

Students Attaining Academic Outcomes

Outcome 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Earned High School Course Credits (ages 13-21)*
US 48,89850.5%46,37447.9%39,46452%
Earned a GED or Obtained High School Diploma (ages 16-21)
US 10,98911.8%9,51710.6%9,35511.2%

Students Attaining Academic Outcomes

Line graph with two lines demonstrating the percentages of students who 1) earned high school course credits and 2) who earned a GED or high school diploma in the United States from 2007 to 2009.

*The Earned High School Course Credits indicator does not include students in Adult Corrections.
Percentages are of the number of age-eligible students for each outcome.



V. United States Academic Performance - Reading and Mathematics

The U.S. Department of Education requires that student performance on reading and mathematics pre- and posttests be reported for long-term students who were enrolled in a program for 90 consecutive calendar days or longer. All State education agencies provide data on the number of long-term students who test below grade level upon entry to their programs as well as on the progress (i.e., grade-level change) students demonstrate on pre- and posttests in reading and mathematics.

Reading

Students Testing Below Grade Level in Reading, Upon Entry

Bar graph depicting the percentages of long-term students who tested below grade level in reading, upon entry, in the United States from 2007 to 2009.

Students who Showed Improvement in Reading on Pre-Post Tests

Bar graph depicting the percentage of long-term students who improved between the most recent pre- and posttest in reading in the United States from 2007 to 2009.

table icon show/hide table data

Performance of Long-Term Students on Reading Pre-Post Tests

United States
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Long-Term Students 65,50754,11354,759
Students Testing Below Grade Level Upon Entry 38,87559.3%35,58165.8%38,88271%
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 34,01133,24232,666
Students who showed negative change from pre-to posttest 5,23715.4%6,34919.1%5,87018%
Students who showed no change from pre- to posttest 4,58213.5%4,17812.6%3,95312.1%
Students who showed improvement from pre- to posttest 24,19271.1%22,71568.3%22,84369.9%

Mathematics

Students Testing Below Grade Level in Mathematics, Upon Entry

Bar graph demonstrating the percentage of long-term students who tested below grade level in mathematics, upon entry, in the United States from 2007 to 2009.

Students who Showed Improvement in Mathematics on Pre-Post Tests

Bar graph demonstrating the percentage of long-term students who improved between the most recent pre- and posttest in mathematics in the United States from 2007 to 2009.

table icon show/hide table data

Performance of Long-Term Students on Mathematics Pre-Post Tests

United States
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Long-Term Students 65,50754,11353,861
Students Testing Below Grade Level Upon Entry 38,18258.3%36,34267.2%38,10770.8%
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 33,06731,66032,623
Students who showed negative change from pre-to posttest 4,83414.6%5,71818.1%5,58617.1%
Students who showed no change from pre- to posttest 4,37513.2%3,56411.3%3,77511.6%
Students who showed improvement from pre- to posttest 23,85872.2%22,37870.7%23,26271.3%

State Notes

Definitions and Presentation of Data

Adult corrections: An adult correctional institution is a facility in which persons, including youth under 21 years of age, are confined as a result of conviction for a criminal offense.

Age-eligible: The age range of students who could reasonably be expected to achieve a given outcome. For example, the age-eligible range for earning a GED or obtaining a high school diploma is 13 to 21 years old. The U.S. Department of Education uses ranges for each outcome intended to capture the majority of students served across the country, though eligibility ranges may vary from State to State.

Juvenile detention: Detention facilities are shorter term institutions that provide care to children who require secure custody pending court adjudication, court disposition, or execution of a court order, or that provide care to children after commitment.

Juvenile corrections: An institution for children and youth who are delinquent that is a public or private residential facility other than a foster home and that is operated for the care of children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision.

Long-term: Students who were enrolled in a program for 90 consecutive calendar days or longer.

Neglect: Neglected programs are institutions for children and youth who are neglected and are public or private residential facilities, other than a foster home, that are operated primarily for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed under applicable State law due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians.
 

Data Sources

U.S. Department of Education, Budget Office

Consolidated State Performance Reports (CSPR) for State Formula Grant Programs Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act As Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: 2007–08, 2008–09, and 2009–10 School Years. Data submitted by States to the U.S. Department of Education Office of Student Achievement and School Accountability.**

  • Title I, Part D, Programs and Facilities
  • Title I, Part D, Students Served
  • Title I, Part D, Academic and Vocational Outcomes
  • Title I, Part D, Academic Performance

**Note: Some of the values that appear on these State Fast Facts pages may not fully align with the values reported in the CSPR at http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/sy09-10part2/index.html. NDTAC provides extensive technical assistance (TA) to Title I, Part D, programs and has in some instances clarified data based on information provided directly from States.