State and National Fast Facts

The National Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center’s (NDTAC) Fast Facts Web pages present National and State longitudinal data on students served under Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, for State agency programs. Fifty States, along with Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, receive funds under Subpart 1. The information provided on these pages highlights grantees’ funding, student demographics, and key academic outcomes for children and youth who are neglected or delinquent and enrolled in these programs. The four key academic outcomes featured also are used to track Title I, Part D, program performance and are of particular importance to grantees and the U.S. Department of Education. Additional data summaries related to the Title I, Part D, program can be found on the following Web pages:

(Data reflected in these charts and tables are compiled from the certified Part II CSPR for Title I, Part D, Subpart 1. 

Choose a State from the drop-down menu to view the data.



I. United States Funding, Programs and Students

Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 provides supplemental funds for education programs for youth who are neglected or delinquent. Subpart 1 funds are awarded directly to State education agencies, which then award subgrants to State agencies serving youth who are neglected or delinquent (e.g., juvenile detention, juvenile corrections, and adult corrections). In the 2010–11 school year (SY), the Federal Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, program distributed $49.16 million to such programs.

Funding Allocation, Number of Programs and Students Served

Program Information 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Subpart 1 Funding
US $ 47,703,870 $ 49,166,325 $ 49,166,325
Number of Programs
US 771 720 861
Number of Students Served
US 125,456 109,146 106,747

Title I, Part D, Subpart 1, Allocation (in millions)

Line graph depicting Federal allocations to United States from 2001 to 2010.

II. United States Program Types

States may use Subpart 1 funds to assist educational programs for youth who are neglected and programs for youth in juvenile detention, juvenile corrections, and adult corrections. Programs for youth who are neglected serve students placed in public or private residential facilities due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians. Delinquent facilities (detention or corrections) are public or private institutions serving children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or who are in need of supervision.

Student Distribution in Subpart 1 Programs by Program Type in 2010-11

Bar graph depicting the percentage of students in each program type in the United States in 2010-11.

table icon show/hide table data

Student Participation by Program Type

United States
Program Type 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Juvenile Detention 40,126 32% 35,198 32.2% 31,118 29.2%
Juvenile Corrections 50,059 39.9% 36,916 33.8% 40,472 37.9%
Adult Corrections 25,711 20.5% 31,280 28.7% 28,357 26.6%
Neglect 7,100 5.7% 4,625 4.2% 5,365 5%
Other 2,460 2% 1,127 1% 1,435 1.3%
Total 125,456 100% 109,146 100% 106,747 100%

III. United States Demographics

All State education agencies must provide data to the U.S. Department of Education on student participation in Part D programs, disaggregating by gender, race/ethnicity, and age. As of SY 2010–11, the Federal racial/ethnic categories reported are American Indian or Alaskan Native; Asian; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander; White; and Two or more races. To compare SY 2010–11 racial ethnic data to the categories from the previous two years, the current Federal categories have been rolled into five in which Asian and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander have been combined into Asian; and Two or more races has been merged into the “Other” category. In addition, if State grantees provided data identifying students as an unidentified or “Other” racial or ethnic group, those data are included here.

Nationally, in SY 2010–11, the majority of students enrolled in State agency neglected and delinquent programs and receiving Part D funds were between the ages of 14 and 18 (70 percent) and 19 and 21 (23 percent), and were predominantly male (84 percent). These percentages reflect the National trends in age and gender across the previous two years.

United States
Student Participation by Race/Ethnicity in 2010-11

Pie graph depicting the race/ethnicity of students in the United States in 2010-11.

table icon show/hide table data

Student Participation by Race/Ethnicity

United States
Race/Ethnicity 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
American Indian/Alaska Native 3,052 2.4% 2,404 2.2% 2,522 2.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 1,560 1.2% 1,517 1.4% 1,660 1.6%
Black, non-Hispanic 55,863 44.5% 50,101 46% 47,544 44.5%
Hispanic 21,677 17.3% 18,690 17.2% 18,803 17.6%
White, non-Hispanic 42,495 33.9% 35,822 32.9% 34,606 32.4%
Other 808 0.6% 405 0.4% 1,612 1.5%
Total 125,455 100% 108,939 100% 106,747 100%

N<# indicates that the demographic data in this cell have been suppressed because of small N sizes. The number at which data are suppressed varies by State and is based on the suppression values State have agreed upon with the U.S. Department of Education. In instances in which only one category meets the suppression number, an additional category is suppressed as well using the same notation although the value may exceed the indicated number.

In addition, States may not have provided racial ethnic data for every student. Therefore, the number of students by race/ethnicity may be lower that the number of students served.



IV. United States Academic Outcomes

All State education agencies must report on a series of academic and vocational outcomes attained by students enrolled in programs receiving Title I, Part D funds. The figures below feature two of the key performance measures—earning high school course credits and attaining a GED or high school diploma. These figures reflect the percentage of age-eligible students attaining these outcomes while enrolled in, or shortly after leaving, a Title I, Part D–funded educational program.

Students Attaining Academic Outcomes

Outcome 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Earned High School Course Credits (ages 13-21)*
US 46,37447.9%39,46452%41,67455.6%
Earned a GED or Obtained High School Diploma (ages 16-21)
US 9,51710.6%9,35511.2%10,76812.8%

Students Attaining Academic Outcomes

Line graph with two lines demonstrating the percentages of students who 1) earned high school course credits and 2) who earned a GED or high school diploma in the United States from 2008 to 2010.

*The Earned High School Course Credits indicator does not include students in Adult Corrections.
Percentages are of the number of age-eligible students for each outcome.



V. United States Academic Performance - Reading and Mathematics

The U.S. Department of Education requires that student performance on reading and mathematics pre- and posttests be reported for long-term students who were enrolled in a program for 90 consecutive calendar days or longer. All State education agencies provide data on the number of long-term students who test below grade level upon entry to their programs as well as on the progress (i.e., grade-level change) students demonstrate on pre- and posttests in reading and mathematics.

Reading

Students Testing Below Grade Level in Reading, Upon Entry

Bar graph depicting the percentages of long-term students who tested below grade level in reading, upon entry, in the United States from 2008 to 2010.

Students who Showed Improvement in Reading on Pre-Post Tests

Bar graph depicting the percentage of long-term students who improved between the most recent pre- and posttest in reading in the United States from 2008 to 2010.

table icon show/hide table data

Performance of Long-Term Students on Reading Pre-Post Tests

United States
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Long-Term Students 54,11354,75957,607
Students Testing Below Grade Level Upon Entry 35,58165.8%38,88271%37,22964.6%
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 33,24232,66632,107
Students who showed negative change from pre-to posttest 6,34919.1%5,87018%5,71217.8%
Students who showed no change from pre- to posttest 4,17812.6%3,95312.1%3,78111.8%
Students who showed improvement from pre- to posttest 22,71568.3%22,84369.9%22,61470.4%

Mathematics

Students Testing Below Grade Level in Mathematics, Upon Entry

Bar graph demonstrating the percentage of long-term students who tested below grade level in mathematics, upon entry, in the United States from 2008 to 2010.

Students who Showed Improvement in Mathematics on Pre-Post Tests

Bar graph demonstrating the percentage of long-term students who improved between the most recent pre- and posttest in mathematics in the United States from 2008 to 2010.

table icon show/hide table data

Performance of Long-Term Students on Mathematics Pre-Post Tests

United States
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Long-Term Students 54,11353,86157,607
Students Testing Below Grade Level Upon Entry 36,34267.2%38,10770.8%37,31364.8%
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 31,66032,62331,805
Students who showed negative change from pre-to posttest 5,71818.1%5,58617.1%5,54617.4%
Students who showed no change from pre- to posttest 3,56411.3%3,77511.6%3,38210.6%
Students who showed improvement from pre- to posttest 22,37870.7%23,26271.3%22,87771.9%

State Notes

Definitions and Presentation of Data

Adult corrections: An adult correctional institution is a facility in which persons, including youth under 21 years of age, are confined as a result of conviction for a criminal offense.

Age-eligible: This term refers to the age range of students who could reasonably be expected to achieve a given outcome. For example, the age-eligible range for earning a GED or obtaining a high school diploma is 16 to 21 years old. The U.S. Department of Education uses ranges for each outcome intended to capture the majority of students served across the country, although eligibility ranges may vary from State to State.

Juvenile detention: Detention facilities are shorter term institutions that provide care to children who require secure custody pending court adjudication, court disposition, or execution of a court order, or that provide care to children after commitment.

Juvenile corrections: An institution for children and youth who are delinquent that is a public or private residential facility other than a foster home and that is operated for the care of children and youth who have been adjudicated delinquent or in need of supervision.

Long-term: Students who were enrolled in a program for 90 consecutive calendar days or longer.

Neglect: Neglected programs are institutions for children and youth who are neglected and are public or private residential facilities, other than a foster home, that are operated primarily for the care of children who have been committed to the institution or voluntarily placed under applicable State law due to abandonment, neglect, or death of their parents or guardians.
 

Data Sources

U.S. Department of Education, Budget Office

Consolidated State Performance Reports (CSPR) for State Formula Grant Programs Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act As Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: 2008–09, 2009–10 and 2010–11 School Years. Data submitted by States to the U.S. Department of Education Office of Student Achievement and School Accountability.*

  • Title I, Part D, Programs and Facilities
  • Title I, Part D, Students Served
  • Title I, Part D, Academic and Vocational Outcomes
  • Title I, Part D, Academic Performance

*Note: Some of the values that appear on these State Fast Facts pages may not fully align with the values reported in the CSPR. NDTAC provides extensive technical assistance to Title I, Part D, programs and has in some instances clarified data based on information provided directly from States. Because of this and differing analytic approaches, NDTAC’s Fast Facts pages may not fully align with the raw data in these resources.